retitle 399332 python-tables: provide -dbg package severity 399332 wishlist thanks
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > thanks for this upload :)) you are welcome!!! Kudos to Antonio for taking care about preparing new package -- great job! > what about providing also a -dbg package as explain here [1] > It should help during bug investigation. I can only +100 on this one -- I have been generating -dbg for packages I maintain and with python-awareness of gdb as we have it now -- they are indeed indispensable... anyone up for a job? related bugreport is #399332 so I am CCing it from now on. Pretty much it should be quite easy -- just add -dbg to control, I think dh would build for those versions, and then in debian/rules you would only need to move _d.so into -dbg pkg > It seems also that test failed on armhf and mipsel architecture for now [2]. > but the error messages are not very explicite. > Illegal instruction ??? > Bus Error ??? yeah -- quite obscure ones > Yaroslav do we have a way to investigate further on thoses FTBFS ? could anyone contact porters and seek help from them? I am quite tight on time here > The migration to testing will be blocked by thoses FTBFS. if no help comes from them we could do evil (don't tell anyone I said that ;-) ) -- just disable unittests while building on those platforms -- =------------------------------------------------------------------= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org