Hi Yaroslav, Il 23/01/2012 16:22, Yaroslav Halchenko ha scritto:
[CUT] >> what about providing also a -dbg package as explain here [1] >> It should help during bug investigation. > > I can only +100 on this one -- I have been generating -dbg for packages > I maintain and with python-awareness of gdb as we have it now -- they > are indeed indispensable... anyone up for a job? related bugreport is > #399332 so I am CCing it from now on. > > Pretty much it should be quite easy -- just add -dbg to control, I > think dh would build for those versions, and then in debian/rules you > would only need to move _d.so into -dbg pkg I can take in charge it ... but not before next weekend >> It seems also that test failed on armhf and mipsel architecture for now [2]. >> but the error messages are not very explicite. > >> Illegal instruction ??? >> Bus Error ??? > > yeah -- quite obscure ones > >> Yaroslav do we have a way to investigate further on thoses FTBFS ? > could anyone contact porters and seek help from them? I am quite tight > on time here > >> The migration to testing will be blocked by thoses FTBFS. > > if no help comes from them we could do evil (don't tell anyone I said > that ;-) ) -- just disable unittests while building on those > platforms Sorry, no idea about which could be the issue. Maybe performing unittests in verbose mode could help. best regards -- Antonio Valentino -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org