Unfortunately I cannot reproduce the problem with cifs because I shifted to 2.6.10.
I use smbfs with this kernel and do not experience any problem. I believe the bug has been fixed.


Steve Langasek wrote:
Does this bug also occur when using the cifs driver instead of the smbfs
driver?  It's my impression that the smbfs driver is no longer
well-maintained upstream in 2.6, and that the cifs driver is a better
choice.  I'm not sure if we should consider this bug release-critical when
there are lots of other problematic smbfs bugs out there even if this one
gets fixed.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to