Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 23:21 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó: > If, as you say, the sparc failure is expected to be fixed soon, I don’t > understand if there would be any problem with uploading with the > alpha/LAM change now, keeping sparc with openmpi. If you are concerned > that mpi-defaults will fail to build on sparc, that should not be a > concern: can get built when openmpi is built on sparc, but in the > meantime it will give us mpi-default-dev on alpha. Or is something else > to take into account that I overlooked?
No, I just read your email as the upload was kind of urgent. If it is, I'd propose we go for alpha and sparc using LAM. If it's not, I can fix alpha and sparc in openmpi and upload mpi-defaults with alpha and sparc using Open MPI. I'd prefer this, though I do not know if it's reasonable since we could also go back to Open MPI with a later upload. What is your preferred option? Best regards Manuel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
