* Manuel Prinz [Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:08:16 +0100]: > Am Dienstag, den 17.03.2009, 23:21 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó: > > If, as you say, the sparc failure is expected to be fixed soon, I don’t > > understand if there would be any problem with uploading with the > > alpha/LAM change now, keeping sparc with openmpi. If you are concerned > > that mpi-defaults will fail to build on sparc, that should not be a > > concern: can get built when openmpi is built on sparc, but in the > > meantime it will give us mpi-default-dev on alpha. Or is something else > > to take into account that I overlooked?
> No, I just read your email as the upload was kind of urgent. If it is, > I'd propose we go for alpha and sparc using LAM. If it's not, I can fix > alpha and sparc in openmpi and upload mpi-defaults with alpha and sparc > using Open MPI. I'd prefer this, though I do not know if it's reasonable > since we could also go back to Open MPI with a later upload. > What is your preferred option? Well, my preference would be to get a working mpi-defaults-dev in all architectures as soon as possible, but if you have grounds to believe openmi will be available on alpha and again on sparc soon, I don’t have any inconvenient to wait a few days. Let’s do that. Thanks, and sorry for all the hassle. -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org