On So, 2011-03-06 at 13:03 +0000, David Bremner wrote: > In my experiments, adding to sythesis-sdk.pc did not fix the problem, > while adding it to synthesis.pc did. I seem to recall that > synthesis-sdk.pc is not used by the syncevolution configuration > currently (at least in 1.1.99.2). Of course this could change in the > future. > > It seems no worse to me to add -lsmltk to synthesis.pc, and maybe a bit > better, since clearly it isn't an extra dependency there.
In the "load libsynthesis.so at runtime" scenario (the one not currently used by SyncEvolution) libsmltk.so is an extra dependency of libsynthesissdk.a. Anyway, I suggest you fix it with a distro patch as you suggested, then please send it my way and I'll look at some of the other scenarios. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
