Hi Ola,

在 2005/10/3 上午 1:54 時,Ola Lundqvist 寫到:

How did you tested and found what kind of security problem?
I assume you found you couldn't pass the test 109,121 of testfs.sh  
script, right?


Actually I run the rootesc program and saw that it was possible to
escape.

I think the rootesc program is only working for the bug in 2.4 kernel patches in Debian, for other fails in testfs.sh, I guess probably needs other exploit.

I have upgraded to 0.30.208-2, I still got the same fails on i386,  
but no errors on powerpc after I rebuilt the util-vserver package  
from source.


Ahh now I see. Missed that you used different architectures in your
testing.

Yes, that's why I have another powerpc related bug report.
Sorry for the confusion, I will help to test on i386 and powerpc for you.

I wonder why it do not fail after your rebuild. Maybe it pass
only if I compile on a vserver patched system...

Could you please confirm this?
Maybe, I should recompile the kernel patch+tools on i386 with a vserver 2.0 patched system, cause I got fails on 2.6.12 and util-vserver 0.30.208-2 from sid still, but all pass with same version from sid on powerpc after a rebuild of util-vserver package.

-Andrew

Reply via email to