> Mmm. I think that's wishful thinking on the part of rock-dev. We > already have the latest git of gccxml (referenced in the above) > packaged and it was used in the build that failed. > > I see, I've added a note the related upstream bug
http://www.gccxml.org/Bug/view.php?id=14912 best, Gert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
