On Fri, 2015-05-01 05:05:10 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Control: tag -1 - patch > > Hi! > > On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 12:09:16 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote: >>> Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely >>> The one before which is in jessie works fine. >>> I.e. 0.19.0-2 without the NMU fix >> >> gparted needs a newer udisks2, see #782838. Proposed patch attached. > >> diff -Nru gparted-0.19.0/debian/control gparted-0.19.0/debian/control >> --- gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2014-06-11 14:50:55.000000000 +0000 >> +++ gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2015-04-26 16:02:28.000000000 +0000 >> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ >> >> Package: gparted >> Architecture: any >> -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} >> +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, udisks2 (>= 2.1.5-1) >> Suggests: xfsprogs, reiserfsprogs, reiser4progs, jfsutils, ntfs-3g, >> dosfstools, mtools, yelp, kpartx, dmraid, dmsetup, gpart >> Description: GNOME partition editor > > As pointed out in #783397 this fix is incorrect. The correct fix is to > use a Breaks, so that there's no unnecessary Depends introduced. > > Thanks, > Guillem
Hello Guillem, Just to clarify this. ;) I agree there is no need for an unnecessary dependency. As I can see, gparted doesn't break udisks2. Do you mean to add Breaks: udisks2 (<< 2.1.5) to gparted's debian/control? Regards, Aníbal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature