Hi! On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 19:51:57 +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Fri, 2015-05-01 05:05:10 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Control: tag -1 - patch
> > On Sun, 2015-04-26 at 12:09:16 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote: > >>> Just tried out the newest upload of gparted. Which fails completely > >>> The one before which is in jessie works fine. > >>> I.e. 0.19.0-2 without the NMU fix > >> > >> gparted needs a newer udisks2, see #782838. Proposed patch attached. > > > >> diff -Nru gparted-0.19.0/debian/control gparted-0.19.0/debian/control > >> --- gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2014-06-11 14:50:55.000000000 +0000 > >> +++ gparted-0.19.0/debian/control 2015-04-26 16:02:28.000000000 +0000 > >> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > >> > >> Package: gparted > >> Architecture: any > >> -Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends} > >> +Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, udisks2 (>= 2.1.5-1) > >> Suggests: xfsprogs, reiserfsprogs, reiser4progs, jfsutils, ntfs-3g, > >> dosfstools, mtools, yelp, kpartx, dmraid, dmsetup, gpart > >> Description: GNOME partition editor > > > > As pointed out in #783397 this fix is incorrect. The correct fix is to > > use a Breaks, so that there's no unnecessary Depends introduced. > As I can see, gparted doesn't break udisks2. It seems to break in combination with older udisks2. > Do you mean to add > > Breaks: udisks2 (<< 2.1.5) > > to gparted's debian/control? Yes. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org