HI, Am Montag, den 17.08.2015, 12:03 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess: > So, why does Cabal's dependency resolver perform so much worse than > cabal-install's?
that is a good question, especially as Cabal has less to do (i.e. only consider installed packages). If we can isolate the problem nicely, I’ll be happy to discuss this with upstream. > Note that git-annex 5.20150812 went back to using cabal configure, > rather than Setup configure, so I expect it will probably build > everywhere again. There seems to be a bug somewhere in the cabal > system however. I’d hate to see a build-depends on "cabal". cabal really should not be a requisite to building packages, being a downloader and what not, and it just shouldn’t be necessary :-( Maybe the flag assignment works as well. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
