On 05-03-16 16:44, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > On Sat, 05 Mar 2016, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>> while pandas builds on intel it fails on several other architectures as >>> reported in #814795. This has been reported upstream[1] who does not >>> seem to be really interested in solving the issue. Any help from >>> porters would be really welcome. >> >> The outstanding RC bugs in pandas are preventing testing migration of >> python-geopandas which now correctly depends on python-pandas (#814938). >> >> Since the support for BE platforms is not likely to arrive in the near >> future, can we ignore the test failures on these architectures until then? > > I would better seek removal of pandas from those platforms. We do know > that pandas has issues on those and upstream doesn't support them and we > (or I) so far have failed to provide adequate support on those. I would > prefer not to carry it there altogether then. > > What do you think?
I'm not opposed, it better reflects that those architectures are not supported (if you set the list of supported architectures in pandas). It does require all pandas reverse dependencies to also be removed from those architectures, and recursively their reverse dependencies as well. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
