Your message dated Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:10:46 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes >90% CPU) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 04 07:13:05 2006 Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Feb 2006 15:13:05 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zux163-099.adsl.green.ch ([80.254.163.99] helo=cerberus.lpr.ch) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F5P61-0006qM-0U for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 04 Feb 2006 07:13:05 -0800 Received: by cerberus.lpr.ch (Postfix, from userid 9258) id 4B7B718957; Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:12:51 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes >90% CPU Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18 Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:12:50 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: dovecot Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable after upgrading dovecot today, the /usr/sbin/dovecot cannot be stopped by KILL -HUP, and /etc/init.d/dovecot stop respectively. Moreover, the process consumes loads of resources. top reports: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 17565 root 18 0 1364 1364 1116 R 91.2 1.1 10:25.25 dovecot Any hint? Thanks, Lukas http://www.lpr.ch Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-==============-==============-============================================ pn dovecot <none> (no description available) ii dovecot-common 1.0.beta2-1 secure mail server that supports mbox and ma ii dovecot-imapd 1.0.beta2-1 secure IMAP server that supports mbox and ma ii dovecot-pop3d 1.0.beta2-1 secure POP3 server that supports mbox and ma -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i586) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.32 Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --->From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 05 10:11:13 2006 Received: (at 351384-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2006 18:11:13 +0000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ulisse.dmgroup.hu ([195.70.36.103]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F5oLx-0006x4-B6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 10:11:13 -0800 Received: from [62.94.93.130] (helo=eszakisark.kobold.it) by ulisse.dmgroup.hu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1F5oLV-0007w0-0Z for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:10:45 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=eszakisark.kobold.it) by eszakisark.kobold.it with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) id 1F5oLW-0001RF-O9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:10:46 +0100 Subject: Re: Bug#351384: Acknowledgement (dovecot cannot be stopped, consumes >90% CPU) From: Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/tAV/yVnqlWtM2gb/jTf" Organization: Debian (http://www.debian.org) Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 19:10:46 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --=-/tAV/yVnqlWtM2gb/jTf Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Il giorno dom, 05/02/2006 alle 19.17 +0200, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: > On Sun, 2006-02-05 at 11:54 -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > "DH parameters are now set for SSL to get forward secrecy, and Dovecot=20 > > doesn't really start until it sees them for the first time. The first=20 > > generation may take minutes, or even longer if you have an old computer= ." > >=20 > > Timo, Do you recommend we include pregenerated parameters? =20 >=20 > Dovecot should finish building them within a few minutes unless it's > being done on a really old computer, so I wouldn't really recommend > doing that.. In the meanwhile, let's close this bug report. --=20 Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .''`. Proud Debian GNU/Linux developer, admin and user. : :' : `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~kobold/ `- _____________________________________________________________________ 1024D/7F961564, fpr 5465 6E69 E559 6466 BF3D 9F01 2BF8 EE2B 7F96 1564 --=-/tAV/yVnqlWtM2gb/jTf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBD5j+mK/juK3+WFWQRAo4KAJ9khwQA7PVTJtrJWYmC5gweaC+OkgCePJJt gx63xtOH0JifG2eDgqXQptk= =/0st -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/tAV/yVnqlWtM2gb/jTf--
--- End Message ---
