On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:39:48 +0100 Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebas...@xs4all.nl> 
wrote:
> On 10/31/2016 05:13 AM, Anders Kaseorg wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> >> The recent git upload FTBFS on mips64el due to OOM, the missing build on
> >> mips64el is preventing the qgis rebuild as part of the ongoing gdal
> >> transition (#842288).
> >>
> >> The build was performed on mipsel-manda-02 which is known to have issues
> >> like these (although git built successfully on this buildd before).
> >> Perhaps a rebuild on another buildd will be sufficient.
> > 
> > Eep.
> > 
> > Looking at 
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=git&arch=mips64el, the build 
> > has been attempted three times now, including once on mipsel-aql-02, 
> > failing all three times with out of memory errors.  None of the failing 
> > tests (t0023-crlf-am.sh, t0064-sha1-array.sh, t0302-credential-store.sh) 
> > have changed between 2.10.1 and 2.10.2, and 2.10.1 built with no trouble.  
> > These tests should be using basically no memory (about 4 MB each).
> > 
> > Maybe another test running in parallel is using memory and causing these 
> > tests to fail?  Could these build machines be so underpowered that they 
> > shouldn’t be setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=4?
> > 
> > Unless someone familiar with the mips64el buildd situation has a better 
> > plan, I’m unsure how to proceed except by disabling individual failing 
> > tests, or the entire test suite, for mips64el.
> > 
> > Any ideas?
> 
> Disabling the tests on mips64el is reasonable.
> 
> You can also do a build on the mips64el porterbox if that succeeds
> without changes you can just upload that.

It is better to understand what is going on first. git is an important piece of
software and the tests are here for a reason. As Bas said, we have porterboxes
where it is very easy to install packages and try to reproduce this, so I'd
suggest that as a first step.

The machines should be fine, they have 8GB of memory, which should be sufficient
for parallel=4.

Cheers,
Emilio

Reply via email to