Hi, Frank Küster wrote: > I don't think this is the correct solution. We already have > > conflicts;texlive-common;tetex-bin (<< 2007), tetex-base (<< 2007), > tetex-extra (<< 2007), tetex-doc (<< 2007) > > Furthermore, in all of Rene's reports there is something like > > Versions of packages texlive-font-utils depends on: > ii libc6 2.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries > pn texlive-base <none> (no description available) > pn texlive-common <none> (no description available) > > On a normal install, apt-get or aptitude will first install tl-common > before trying any of the packages Rene reported about, and this will
it didn't. > remove tetex-bin except for the empty transitional package. By the way it didn't. On the seconf try continuing the upgrade it did, yes,but not at the first run. > I've tried this long ago... > > So either something else is going wrong, or Rene used some --force-foo Just a plain upgrade out of aptitudes UI. And no, I didn't use any --force foo. I wouldn't have reported a bug if I had. Gr��e/Regards, Ren� -- .''`. Ren� Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
