-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote: > Frank Küster wrote: > > I don't think this is the correct solution. We already have > > > > conflicts;texlive-common;tetex-bin (<< 2007), tetex-base (<< 2007), > > tetex-extra (<< 2007), tetex-doc (<< 2007) > > > > Furthermore, in all of Rene's reports there is something like > > > > Versions of packages texlive-font-utils depends on: > > ii libc6 2.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries FWIW, this was upgraded in this same dist-upgrade run. I see that the texlive binaries for ppc already picked up a dep on libc6 >= 2.5, maybe that has something to do with it? > > On a normal install, apt-get or aptitude will first install tl-common > > before trying any of the packages Rene reported about, and this will > > it didn't. [...] > it didn't. On the seconf try continuing the upgrade it did, yes,but not > at the first run. > > > I've tried this long ago... Not to mention the behaviour is non-deterministic. I've seen that often that it did a specific order on system A and another one on B. Gr??e/Regards, Ren? - -- .''`. Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGH1ot+FmQsCSK63MRAnPSAJ0Xn8V3gE1p2u80H2pVFZs0n3AKxQCfRRla 7ljw3rAX55J4BOKd98f5srE= =b+j/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
