-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> > I don't think this is the correct solution.  We already have
> > 
> > conflicts;texlive-common;tetex-bin (<< 2007), tetex-base (<< 2007), 
> > tetex-extra (<< 2007), tetex-doc (<< 2007)
> > 
> > Furthermore, in all of Rene's reports there is something like
> > 
> > Versions of packages texlive-font-utils depends on:
> > ii  libc6                         2.5-1      GNU C Library: Shared libraries

FWIW, this was upgraded in this same dist-upgrade run. I see that
the texlive binaries for ppc already picked up a dep on libc6 >= 2.5, maybe
that has something to do with it?

> > On a normal install, apt-get or aptitude will first install tl-common
> > before trying any of the packages Rene reported about, and this will
> 
> it didn't.
[...]
> it didn't. On the seconf try continuing the upgrade it did, yes,but not
> at the first run.
> 
> > I've tried this long ago...

Not to mention the behaviour is non-deterministic. I've seen that often
that it did a specific order on system A and another one on B.

Gr??e/Regards,
 
Ren?
- -- 
 .''`.  Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGH1ot+FmQsCSK63MRAnPSAJ0Xn8V3gE1p2u80H2pVFZs0n3AKxQCfRRla
7ljw3rAX55J4BOKd98f5srE=
=b+j/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to