On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, ha shao wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 01:34:32PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Type 3 can embedded scalable font. > > > > Maybe we can convert the public arphicpl font to Type 3, and used it as > > de facto chinese ps font. > > > > Font is not a problem in this case. Mr. Yoshihiro Take's GS-CJK can make use > of > the arphic (or any) ttf fonts for ps printing. It is the postscript font name > that is the problem. We want to find a default font name for Chinese > postscript > font so that PS files created on CLE, Turbolinux chinese, Debian ... can > interchanged and printed without problems. I cann't understand what's the problem? If we have a Font, we will have a font name, too. With a free available and variant format font, we can distribute it anywhere. It will likely have a default font name. > Hopefully someone know better with desktop publishing can give us > some clues.