Great! I agree. 在08-4-30，Zu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写道： > > I prefer merging and I agree that "traditional and simplified Chinese are > all Chinese". > > > -- > Email/Gtalk/MSN/QQ: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 瑞豪开源VPS - 基于Linux/Xen > http://www.RasHost.com <http://www.rashost.com/> > > 2008/4/30 Kanru Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > I think we should respect the opinions from who are actually using the > > lists, so I forward this mail to the lists. > > > > 2008/4/30 Andrew Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Dear folks, > > > > > > Foka went on IRC and ask for merge debian-chinese-big5 and > > > debian-chinese-gb into one mailing list. Please check the log for > > > details or read these(I copied from my log) below: > > > > > > 01:56 < foka> 我最近有��想法：如果把 debian-chinese-big5 和 > > > debian-chinese-gb > > > 二合�橐唬�大家看法如何？ :-) > > > 01:57 < aguai> foka: 不懂？ > > > 01:57 < paulliu> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:P > > > 01:57 < paulliu> aguai, 那是���� mailing list > > > 01:58 < foka> paulliu, [EMAIL PROTECTED] UTF-8 年代了，也不再存在以前 > > > Big5、GB2312 �]件�y�a的���}了。 > > > 01:58 < paulliu> 嗯, [EMAIL PROTECTED] big5 的意思����是 > > > chinese-traditional > > > 01:59 < paulliu> �m然大家都是中��人...不�^繁�w跟���w..��是��有一些���x上 > > > 的困�_.. > > > 02:01 < paulliu> 不�^, debian-chinese-big5 �]有甚�N traffic 就是了.. > > > 02:01 < paulliu> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > 02:01 < paulliu> 我是�X得, 繁�w中文跟���w中文, 有�r是��分�_的... > > > 02:02 < foka> 其��整�w�碚f��好；我�J�R好多台���淼呐笥眩�很快熟�R���w字 > > > 了。大��朋友看繁�w字，倒也不是���}，只是��不出�矶�已。 > > > 02:02 < paulliu> 是可以看的懂, 但是我自己的����是...偶��要猜... > > > 02:03 < foka> paulliu, 呵呵，正好互相�W��。 :-) > > > 02:03 < paulliu> 也�S���w中文猜中意思的�C率是 9x%, 日文�h字 4x%...... > > > > > > Debian do have lists for different languages. I think it's easier for > > > support our users. Cause they can use their mother language to ask > > > question and got answer by the mother language. We have separately > > lists > > > because long time ago, we have encoding difference problem on big5 > > and > > > gb2312, so that we have two lists for Chinese. > > > > > > But my opinion now Debian is a global community, it is not specfic > > for > > > any nation or racism. Who use traditional or simplified Chinese are > > > equal participant. > > > > > > But everyone can has opinion. Paulliu said that traditional and > > > simplified Chinese are all Chinese, which I agreed. And Paulliu also > > > think traditional and simplified Chinese should be separate. > > > > > > However the point I concerned is our users support and free software > > > community. > > > > > > So I'd like to ask, what's you guys' opinion: > > > Does our community only limited in Taiwan or China? > > > Do you guys agree people from over the world can be also part of > > Debian > > > community? > > > You guys prefer to do the user support together or separately, and > > why? > > > > > > Please give your valuable opinion. > > > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ~ Kanru Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 'v' > > http://stu.csie.ncnu.edu.tw/~kanru.96/<http://stu.csie.ncnu.edu.tw/%7Ekanru.96/> > > // \\ GnuPG-Key ID: 365CC7A2 > > /( )\ Fingerprint: 3278 DFB4 BB28 6E8C 9E1F 1ECB B1B7 5B5F 365C C7A2 > > ^`~'^ > > > > >
-- 以Wiki模式创建Linux中文文档，欢迎加入 http://www.linux-wiki.cn/
