Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >The people who do the work of building official release images at >release time _is_ the "CD" team, so those who want to have images for >their pet cloud providers built together with the other official images >at release time and distributed through the regular Debian channels will >then have to submit code to the Debian CD team, in a form that they >accept. AIUI the "format that they accept" will still be debated, but >will surely include the concerns from the people who take care of the >Debian trademark.
And, to make it more explicit, we're also happy/willing/wanting to get more people involved in the production of the images that we ship. Again, the "CD" team name is a really bad one by now! >Those who just want to build images themselves and distribute them at >random places can just continue to do what they are already doing. And >here lies the most difficult issue, which is how exactly those can be >presented as "Debian". Clearly they cannot be called "Official Debian >images", but they probably shouldn't be called "not Debian" either. Quite, and this is part of the discussion the trademark team want to happen. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] "Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast." Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html
