Manoj wrote: >On Tue, Mar 29 2016, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> And, to make it more explicit, we're also happy/willing/wanting to get >> more people involved in the production of the images that we >> ship. Again, the "CD" team name is a really bad one by now! > > Raises hand.
Woot, thanks! One thing *I* would love to see is a clear guide to the different cloud images that we could/should be providing, with details for each like: * which provider(s) they cover * what tools are used to make the images * what packages are needed beyond a basic "standard" debootstrap * any special processing needed for publishing etc. I'm naively hoping that this kind of doc is already available and I just haven't found it, but more realistically I'm expecting not... :-) -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] "Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast." Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html
