On 28 Feb 2006, Anthony Towns stated: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:09:35PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: >> WHEREAS >> 1. ndiswrapper's purpose is to allow non-free drivers to be used. >> THE COMMITTEE CONCLUDES THAT >> 6. ndiswrapper belongs in contrib. >> AND THE COMMITTEE THEREFORE REQUESTS AS FOLLOWS >> 9. ftpmasters and the ndiswrapper maintainers should cooperate to >> move >> nsidwrapper to contrib. [...] >> 10. The Policy Manual maintainers should take steps to adjust the >> language regarding main and contrib to clarify and improve it. [...] > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 08:30:33PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: >> WHEREAS >> 1. ndiswrapper's purpose is to allow non-debian (and typically >> non-free) >> drivers to be used. >> THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THAT >> 6. ndiswrapper belongs in contrib. >> AND THE COMMITTEE THEREFORE REQUESTS AS FOLLOWS >> 9. ftpmasters and the ndiswrapper maintainers should cooperate to move >> nsidwrapper to contrib. > > Okay, so I'll vote against both these.
As do I. manoj -- So we follow our wandering paths, and the very darkness acts as our guide and our doubts serve to reassure us.- Jean-Pierre de Caussade, eighteenth-century Jesuit priest Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]