On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:08:21PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Bug#366938: svn commit access to the d-i repo > ..."): > > I don't. I think delegating a decision needs to be a bit more explicit than > > that, it's my understanding that this was just AJ telling Sven what his > > appeal options were. He can of course clarify if he disagrees, but AFAICT > > this is a case of Sven asking us to override the DPL.
> We don't need to agree on this point. (Note that I if AJ thought he > was telling Sven was hit appeal options were, he was wrong, since the > TC can't overrule the leader on nontechnical questions.) > > > 3. Access controls to source code repositories are not something in the > > > regular domain of the Technical Committee. However, in this case the > > > decision was delegated by the Project Leader to the Technical > > > Committee as appeal instance of the Project Leader's decision. > > suggest striking this and renumbering paragraph 4 as 3. > I think it is important for us to say that we don't think this is our > normal remit. How about: > 3. Access controls to source code repositories are not something in the > regular domain of the Technical Committee. However, there is some > doubt in this case whether the Project Leader has intended to ask > the Technical Committee to review the decision. Given that we have a very straightforward method of determining what AJ's intent was (i.e., asking him), I would rather we did that than pass a resolution that preserves this needless doubt. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]