Hi Michael, On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:48:54PM +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Hi Don,
> Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> writes: > > I'd like to get this particular bug discussion restarted. > Thanks for your mail. > > From my understanding, a static, non generator version of > > lvm2_activation_generator_systemd_red_hat.c will allow for the > > activation of lvm2 after the addition of an lvm device by udev/systemd. > > > > Michael: Is this correct? > To the best of my knowledge, a static non-generator patch will make lvm2 > work with systemd, yes. > I offer to work on producing an easily mergable patch, should Bastian > agree to that. This was my concern with the technical implementation as well. I would be happy with lvm2/systemd integration that used a static configuration instead of requiring a generator. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature