On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:11:03PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 2013, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 05:49:13PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > Bastian: Would such a patch be acceptable in principle?
> > After systemd was fixed, yes.
> Can you let me know which part of systemd needed to be fixed? [What bug#
> is this?]
It is #720850. systemd breaks backward compatibility.
> Can you also clarify for me why the patch needs to wait for systemd to
> be fixed?
Because the lvm2 service would fail the same way then the init script.
Bastian
--
We have found all life forms in the galaxy are capable of superior
development.
-- Kirk, "The Gamesters of Triskelion", stardate 3211.7
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140116134756.ga2...@mail.waldi.eu.org
