On 6 February 2014 11:20, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote: > I therefore intend to change my vote to list FD first iff Steve does the > same, since I think it's up to him to decide whether he wants to stop, > rework, and start again, or just continue on since the vote has started > anyway.
The votes so far are: ian: UL DL OL VL GR *FD* UT OT VT DT andi: UL DL OL VL *FD* GR UT DT OT VT steve: UL DL *FD* OL VL UT DT OT=VT GR russ: DT GR DL UT *FD* OT VT UL OL VL colin: UL DL OL UT DT GR *FD* OT VL VT don: DT DL UT UL OT OL VT VL GR *FD* ian2: FD UL DL OL VL GR UT OT VT DT andi2: FD UL DL OL VL GR UT DT OT VT With the initial vote, the following options are eliminated: OT, VT (ian, andi, steve, russ vote these below FD) With Ian and Andi's changed votes, the following options are eliminated: OL, VL (ian2, andi2, steve, russ vote these below FD) That leaves UL, UT, DL, DT and GR still in the race against FD. If Steve changes his vote to FD > *, and Russ does likewise as he's stated, the vote will be decided as FD again. If no one changes their vote, then, at present, the comparisons are: UL = FD 3:3 (steve, colin, don in favour; russ, ian2, andi2 against) UT = FD 3:3 (russ, colin, don in favour; steve, ian/ian2, andi/andi2 against) DT = FD 3:3 (russ, colin, don in favour; steve, ian/ian2, andi/andi2 against) GR = FD 3:3 (russ, colin, don in favour; steve, ian2, andi/andi2 against) So those options will be eliminated if Bdale and Keith don't vote, or if either Bdale or Keith vote them below FD. DL > FD 4:2 (ian2, andi2 against) That can only be eliminated at this point if both Bdale and Keith vote it below FD. It's the only option that had all six original votes ranking it above FD. (As it stands, DL would thus win the vote since all other options are eliminated) As it stands, that also means that Bdale and Keith could collude to determine the outcome of the vote amonst {D,U}{L,T} by only voting the option they prefer above FD. GR comparisons are: UL > GR 5:1 (russ against) UT = GR 3:3 (steve, colin, don in favour; ian, andi, russ against) DL > GR 6:0 DT > GR 4:2 (ian, andi against) Rankings between remaning actual outcomes is: 4x UL > DL > UT > DT (steve, colin, ian, andi) 2x DT > DL > UT > UL (russ, don) So that's UL > DL > DT 4:2 UL > UT > DT 4:2 DL > UT 6:0 It seems to me that if this ballot fails to FD, any future ballots should skip options: OT, VT (insufficient support over FD) OL, VL (at least 6 of 8 committee members prefer UL and DL over these options) It seems unlikely that there's any actual support for UT, either. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <a...@erisian.com.au> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJS_LCVhLfgK9zi6PjrZnDQ8edd+qHYczG-=da79eh1pqtv...@mail.gmail.com