Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > Rationale (Constitution 6.1(5)):
> 1. Currently libpam-systemd (which is pulled in by quite a few > dependency chains) Depends on `systemd-sysv | systemd-shim'. > 2. The effect of this is that installing certain leaf packages which > depend on libpam-systemd can cause a user's init system to be > switched to systemd, even on systems where a user has deliberately > chosen not to use the default init system, and even when the switch > is unnecessary. > 3. Swappping the order of these dependencies would avoid that and has > no harmful effect. > Decision (Constitution 6.1(4)): > 4. We therefore overrule the decision of the maintainer of > libpam-systemd binary package. The Depends entry > systemd-sysv | systemd-shim (>= 8-2) > should be replaced by > systemd-shim (>= 8-2) | systemd-sysv > Release (Constitution 6.1(5)): > 5. We request that the Release Team allow this change to into jessie. > (This request should be conveyed to the Release Team, after the > change is in unstable, by filing an unblock request in the usual > way.) This looks fine to me. So, this is also the last call for anyone to explain what harmful effect this could have if they think it would have a harmful effect. My understanding is that all of the possible harmful effects have been fixed by various other changes. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/877fzesox5....@hope.eyrie.org