On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:26, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I believe arch should be considered as well, when one decide if the > version control system should be changed. Being able to do off-line > commits is a good thing. :)
I must defer to the better judgement of those who have had experience with each. All I know about either is second-hand. I have heard lots of good reports about Subversion, but very little (good or bad) about Arch, so I'll need lots of convincing to cast my vote with Arch. Ben -- synrg at debian dot org
