|| On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:38:08 -0300 || Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ba> On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 16:26, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> I believe arch should be considered as well, when one decide if the
>> version control system should be changed. Being able to do off-line
>> commits is a good thing. :)
ba> I must defer to the better judgement of those who have had
experience
ba> with each. All I know about either is second-hand. I have heard
lots
ba> of good reports about Subversion, but very little (good or bad)
about
ba> Arch, so I'll need lots of convincing to cast my vote with Arch.
Looking today at internet I found a really interesting tool:
http://svk.elixus.org/
This add the decentralized version control system to
Subversion.
Really interesting.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
pgp32NQZi26Bc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
