|| On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:13:18 +0200
 || Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

mb> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:11:51PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> || On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST)
>> || Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
>> 
>> I personaly use one changelog entry like:
>> 
>> * NOT RELEASED YET
>> 
>> The d-i tem uses the distribution set to UNRELEASED 

mb> This is considered to be the better option, or otherwise somebody might
mb> upload your package to ftp.debian.org, if you keep a signed .changes
mb> files floating around. This is not possible with the distribution set to
mb> UNRELEASED.

 But why I will send a signed file to anybody?

>> but this broke some scripts like debpool and mini-dinstall so is not
>> good to me.

mb> Well, perhaps a general policy on this should be established and those
mb> packages be fixed. It would make for a nice feature anyway.

In previous upload I changed the changelog to have an * NOT RELEASED
YET entry. We should choose what we will use and if needed change the
changelog without problems.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."

Attachment: pgpoKKq7hDJLr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to