On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:33:33PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > || On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:13:18 +0200 > || Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mb> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:11:51PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> || On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:43:50 +0200 (CEST) > >> || Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> I personaly use one changelog entry like: > >> > >> * NOT RELEASED YET > >> > >> The d-i tem uses the distribution set to UNRELEASED > > mb> This is considered to be the better option, or otherwise somebody might > mb> upload your package to ftp.debian.org, if you keep a signed .changes > mb> files floating around. This is not possible with the distribution set to > mb> UNRELEASED. > > But why I will send a signed file to anybody?
The archive-program you're using might keep them around. I think ftp.gnuab.org is based on debpool (not sure): http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.1-18+kfreebsd.2_kfreebsd-i386.changes I just wanted to point out the possible problem. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
