On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 06:24:55PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote: > People using unofficial packages should be aware about the > dificulties. So I wouldn't mention the unofficial packages in control > files for official Debian packages.
OK. I'll mention it on the website for the unofficial ones. > I also don't like the idea of having special packages for cvs-versions > of software. It is cruft. In this case, the CVS version is usually pretty far ahead of released, and is just as stable. Do you think I should switch the main package to using CVS code? Or just continue to do my unofficial CVS packages and have the official ones be the released version? I know the EB authors would prefer that we not switch to CVS code, so I think that's a bad idea...but on the other hand, the CVS code would be a "better" package for some debian users. -- michael d. ivey [McQ] : "It is a miracle that curiosity survives <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : formal education." http://gweezlebur.com/~ivey/ : -- Albert Einstein encrypted email preferred : -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]