Jim Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Could you please read the Developers Reference section 4.1 second paragraph. > When machines break for whatever reason, sometimes people come to > #debian for help. It's unhelpful to encourage people to break their > mission-critical servers... If Eric wants to do it himself, fine.
Call me cynical but if people doesn't read documentation, fine with me. But you can tell me what is hard to understand at http://www.debian.org/release/unstable/: This distribution is currently in ``testing'' phase. That means that things might break if you run it. Anyone running woody is expected to be informed about any volatilities, usually by following developer-oriented mailing lists; But that is an old discussion. > Of course, not many developers like coming to #debian due to its > present noisiness and relative newbishness, or maybe for other If the existence of unstable should be a secret on #debian I understand why others developers doesn't come there anymore.I only shows up on devel once in a while and mostly to see the topic or hear why unstable broke but that is primaly because I don't really wants to waste time on irc.