On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:53:04PM -0700, John Galt wrote: > > > In fact, the only thing the RFC says to do is to honor Reply-To: headers, > > > which I might note you didn't include in your message. > > > > Why should I, when it would be no different from my From: header? > > It would be in your case: > > Reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
no, that would make it difficult for people to reply privately to him. Mail-Followup-To is the correct header to use. > The difference between pine and mutt is that you KNOW the overflows in > pine.... incorrect, again. the difference between mutt and pine is that mutt is a decent piece of free software that works and follows the relevant standards, while pine is a broken piece of non-free shit which doesn't. > mutt allegedly shares code with pine... since the source-code of both programs is readily available it should be easy enough to check this allegation. craig -- craig sanders