On 03-Jan-01, 22:53 (CST), John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jan 2001, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > I didn't say there was. Does "Mail-Copies-To:" begin with an X? > > RFC 822 this time: > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html > > and Mail-Copies-To: fails to rear it's ugly head, so really should be > under user-defined fields, which are supposed to be X-
Uh, there have been headers added since 822. > > > > Why should I, when it would be no different from my From: header? > > It would be in your case: > > Reply-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org > > would avoid the unnecessary CCs, which is what I assume you want to do. Wrong. This would break my MUA so that "reply" no longer sends mail back to the originator, as it is supposed to do. > The difference between pine and mutt is that you KNOW the overflows in > pine....mutt allegedly shares code with pine... Extremely unlikely, as it originated from elm. Steve -- Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read every list I post to.)