On 23-Apr-01, 17:26 (CDT), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The NMU was buggy, but with all due respect it appears that the package > had not been updated in a long time before that. The standards-version > was really old and you were using pre-FHS path names.
If the NMUer had followed procedure (attempted to contact maintainer, filed diff in BTS, etc.), this might be a legitimate counter-argument. Given that the bugs being fixed weren't RC, to introduce a new bugs (and not even subtle ones) seems particulary ill-advised. Steve -- Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read every list I post to.)