On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:01:39PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:00:01PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > If we don't distribute them, why in hell are we breaking mirrors by > > supporting them? Sounds dodgy to me. > > So that they can compile them? If you don't understand why we should do > that, then there's no point in us two arguing about it.
I can understand why you might say that that's a valid point, but IMHO, we shouldn't fuck up current users (by overloading mirrors), just so we can support LAZY users to compile something THAT IS NOT EVEN IN DEBIAN. -- Daniel Stone Linux Kernel Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 G!>CS d s++:- a---- C++ ULS++++$>B P---- L+++>++++ E+(joe)>+++ W++ N->++ !o K? w++(--) O---- M- V-- PS+++ PE- Y PGP>++ t--- 5-- X- R- tv-(!) b+++ DI+++ D+ G e->++ h!(+) r+(%) y? UF++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------