Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:19:29AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: >> I'm actually referring to all binary modules. But for binary-only modules >> in particular, since you don't have the luxuary of being able to recompile >> them, it's even more important to supply the builder with enough information >> assuming that they're willing to compile it for your specifications.
> and asking them to compile a dozen different versions makes things > better for binary module distributors? No, but they can at least compile one for i386 easily as we're providing matching kernel-headers. You're in exactly the same situation (i.e., without binary modules) anyway if you compile your own kernel so IMHO it's a moot point. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt