On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:11:32AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >ARRGHH!!! > > > >It really ticks me off when someone: > > 1. NMU's one of my packages for a *normal* bug without even thinking > > of checking with me first, > >and > > 2. In so doing, manages to BREAK THE PACKAGE and give it a GRAVE BUG > >and > > 3. Doesn't bother to fix this bug, creating more work for me than > > if he had just asked me in the first place. > > > >There seems to be a rash of this going on lately. I'm not pleased. > > > >Marcelo Magallon, I'm talking to you! > > How ironic ... http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0104/msg00089.html
Want more? http://bugs.debian.org/93443 and scroll to the bottom. -- G. Branden Robinson | I suspect Linus wrote that in a Debian GNU/Linux | complicated way only to be able to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] | that comment in there. http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Lars Wirzenius
pgpqEd3KXaAMY.pgp
Description: PGP signature