>>>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:42:28 +0200, Davide Puricelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said:
Davide> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:37:33PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Federico Di Gregorio wrote: >> >> > libglade and some other packages still depend on the very old >> > libxml1. i just compiled libglade0 (and libglade-gnome0) by >> > simply installing libxml2-dev and rebuilding. anyway, porting a >> > package from libxml1 to libxml2 is quite easy, so i am about to >> > file bugs agains those buggy packages. i am also quite ready to >> > nmu if the authors don't rebuild >> >> 1. file only wishlist bugs >> 2. don't do NMUs without the permission of the maintainers - what >> you >> want is only a wish, not a real bug >> >> > but what's the procedure in this case? i don't want to displease >> > anyone, but this dependency on the old library is annoying quite >> > some of us. >> >> Are there any real problems or what does "annoyning" mean? >> >> > ciao, federico >> >> cu Adrian >> >> -- >> >> Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht, sondern >> weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig. >> >> >> >> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Davide> There're real troubles: for example look at sodipodi; it uses Davide> libglade-gnome0, so I need libxml-dev (libglade-gnome0-dev Davide> depends on it), but now I need to compile it against libxml2 Davide> to close some bugs, but I can't because libxml2-dev conflicts Davide> with libxml-dev. Then convince the libxml maintainer to remove this conflict. It doesn't need to exist. Each lib installs its libs and headers in different places. Jim -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @ http://jimdres.home.mindspring.com | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach
