On 23 Sep 2001 21:36:12 +0100, James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >Any new tool that hypothetically gets written or packages isn't going
>> >to get put in potato either.
>> 
>> Having spent four hours last night to try getting a debhelper 3
>> (unsuccessfully) backported to potato makes me wince at _any_
>> backporting effort.
>
>'any'? What on earth are you talking about?

This is a misunderstanding.

>I've back ported any
>number of unstable things for potato and not once been affected by
>debhelper 3.

Most sid packages have Build-Depends: debhelper 3 and DH_COMPAT=3 in
debian/rules.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber          |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature  | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29


Reply via email to