On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:53:54AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > Documentation isn't software. Neither are conffiles, icons, etc.
When I buy software, all of that is part of what I buy. Foldoc says that one definition of software is "programs plus documentation though this does not correspond with common usage." In any sense interesting to me (and hopefully Debian), icons and the other miscellany that make up a working program are part of that program, and need to be modifiable with it. > In the > meantime, we hold to the spirit, not the letter, of the DFSG, and > acknowledge that things are not quite as clear as they should be for > now. How can you claim that the DFSG, in spirit or letter, encourages non-modifiable material of any sort? Even patch clauses are labeled a compromise by the DFSG. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's not a habit; it's cool; I feel alive. If you don't have it you're on the other side." - K's Choice (probably referring to the Internet) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
