On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:30:18AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> > On the other hand, by taking action we might be able to stop those projects
> > from taking such a misguided course of action.  I think the FSF is making
> > a big mistake with the GFDL.
> 
> I'm curious about your reasoning.  Have you posted it already?  If not,
> maybe it would be good to hear once woody is out.

Jeff, you might want to read:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00071.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00073.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00079.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00081.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00082.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00099.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00112.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00137.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00195.html

People who want to opine about licensing issues really, really should
subscribe to -legal.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     Music is the brandy of the damned.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |     -- George Bernard Shaw
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpea6PUN8qBu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to