>>>>> "Ari" == Ari Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ari> I had been taking the full brunt of the responsibility for Ari> the xscreensaver NMU, but since I was a pre-NM at the time Ari> and sponsors of uploads are supposed to follow Debian policy Ari> as well, he ended up taking most of the responsibility. This Ari> was a similar situation; however, I felt it was necessary at Ari> the time considering the circumstances of the package having Ari> not being updated in over a year and a half despite new Ari> versions being out which fixed bugs, and the lack of any Ari> response from the package maintainer until after the NMU. I Ari> still doubt that I would have gotten any response from the Ari> maintainer at all had it not been for the actual package Ari> upload. Do you specifically agree it was wrong in this instance to upload directly to incoming and not to a delayed queue? In future will you agree to include NMU patches in a bug report to the patch and unless there is a strong reason to do otherwise to upload to a delayed queue? I'm asking you these things in hope of making sure we're on the same page. If you don't agree then I'll try to convince you that you're wrong, but if we are both understanding the best practice the same way, then there's really no more to say.