> > sid=unstable - you know that, don't you? > > We need someone to test unstable, don't we? We can not realistically > test our distribution if the only people running it are those with many > computers who put it on one they aren't really using. Please don't give > our testers crap for actually testing the system in real life > situations.
Nope. We need ourselves to play with unstable - but unstable is not up for testing. That's what *testing* is for! :-) Ideally, Sid should stay as a developer testbed. In fact, when I started using it, I got disappointed because it is not unstable at all. I have only had a major (for me) problem once or twice. Greetings, -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5630-9700 ext. 1366 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF