David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> sid=unstable - you know that, don't you?
> We need someone to test unstable, don't we? We can not realistically > test our distribution if the only people running it are those with many > computers who put it on one they aren't really using. Please don't give > our testers crap for actually testing the system in real life > situations. If somebody _needs_ his computer working 100% ("I've got an essay due in 24 hours...") and runs unstable on it imho some reminder that this might be a bad choice is *required*. cu andreas PS: And please don't forget the fact that I did provide a solution for the original problem.