On Wed, 14 May 2003 14:27, Clay Crouch wrote: > Hmmm.... An ettiquette lesson before a "welcome back" and a work > assignemnt, just because you find my anti-spam measures draconian and my > filter bypass info in my sig to be annoying.
When such lessons are needed they should be dealt with first. > And yes.... I am fully aware of "nettiquette" and it's dim view on long So it wasn't an innocent mistake, as we expected. > Five percent failure, eh? Try zero percent, with zero false positives. I do not jump through any such hoops to send mail. Anyone who does such things will not receive mail from me, that gives at least one source of false-positives. This attitude makes me want to start sending emails to spammers suggesting that they put the magic phrase in their spam... -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page