Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > In that case, I invite any maintainer with a security fix for their package > in 'testing' to upload it to testing for testing-proposed-updates. Problem > solved. Are you the one who will be responsible for reviewing the > packages?
testing, in the absence of a freeze, is a moving target and continuously updated from unstable, without any kind of review. I fail to see why a t-p-o => testing path, or even a separate-testing-updates solution as I've originally proposed, would need a review, but I'm willing to be enlightened. -- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de -- People never change, they only become more who they are.