On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 09:39:30AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > Well, except that it doesn't actually describe the package well. Maybe > > > > insert "FIFO controlled" before "audio player." > > > > > > Or better, "FIFO-controlled", so it doesn't read like a past-tense > > > sentence fragment about FIFO having controlled an audio player. > > > I have almost a ready package, i just now need a fine short description. > > The upstream author is not so happy about the FIFO controlled stuff, > > since it sounds as if using quark is difficult. The main advantages of > > quark are : > > It's by geeks for geeks, but FIFOs scare the target audience? :-)
FWIW, I think the original short description was fine; it conveys the attitude that has likely been taken while developing it, which in turn gives you rather a lot of information about what the end product is likely to be like. Far better than any of the alternatives suggested so far, at any rate :-P Cheers, Nick -- Nick Phillips -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] It may or may not be worthwhile, but it still has to be done.