On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:07:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > This strikes me as a good idea, unless someone has a legit reason to > include an empty documentations file in a package. So speak up if you > do. Maybe a zero length TODO could be considered to have some implied > meaning, but I've seen zero length everything including AUTHORS and > README and NEWS.
Sounds good to me too, I've several "find -size 0" in debian/rules to remove such kind of files. Anyway I think it can be unlikely to remove empty files when they are linked from others files. E.g. a .html having a link to another empty .html. In such a case having the empty html file is better than having no html at all to avoid future browser complains. I no it is a bit weird situation but can't the heuristic "remove empty files if they have no .html extension"? Cheers -- Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} - http://www.bononia.it/zack/ " I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant! " -- G.Romney
pgpwvsDxEW5UK.pgp
Description: PGP signature