Hi, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 11:26:12 -0500
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (IMO, the kernel ignoring $(CC) is the kernel's problem.)
>
> One problem doesn't excuse the other.
So how can we get it into your head that the other is _not_ a problem?
You asked for gcc-2.95. You got gcc-2.95. Whatever else you got should be
of no consequence whatsoever. If gcc-2.95 hadn't pulled in gcc which
pulled in gcc-3.3, you'd've got _no_ gcc. That strikes me as being
singularly unhelpful.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
--
It looks like it's up to me to save our skins. Get into that garbage chute,
flyboy!
-- Princess Leia Organa
